Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Review of "Us" and "Them": Multimedia Explorations of Prejudice and Intolerance in American History (December, 1997)

"Us" and "Them": Multimedia Explorations of Prejudice and Intolerance in American History
by Ilana Rembelinsky

This article details a project wherein eighth graders produce a multimedia presentation addressing incidences of prejudice and intolerance in U.S. history, utilizing Us and Them, a book produced by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Students form groups of two and select on of the book's 14 stories as their topic. Then, they produce several written documents dealing with their topic: a brief summary of the facts of the case, a first-person narrative in the voice of one of the participants in the event, a summary of five or more other major events in U.S. history that occurred within 10 years before or after then chosen event. These written assignments are then augmented with three or more scanned images and one to two minutes of video footage illustrating the incident. Students are also required to maintain a learning log, in which they take notes and respond to questions about videos or other media which they view in class.

Q1: How effective is this project at leading to student learning about historical events as well as building computer skills?
A1: In my opinion, this seems like a good balance of these two components. Unlike the project described in a previously reviewed article (Making History Come Alive, November 2003), this one maintains what I consider a more appropriate emphasis on the history, with the computer use as a sizable but minority consideration. I also like that this project employs a number of different approaches to the event (i.e., both a summary as well as a creative first-person narrative).

Q2: Is this project feasible at schools with a wide variety of available tech resources?
A2: In a word, yes. The article was written in 1997, and the project was carried out at a school with only two computers per classroom. Through careful organization, all students were able to schedule time on the available computers and complete their projects. Twelve years later, even poorly-equipped schools probably have greater tech resources than the school at which this program was carried out. Also, more students have computers at home, and many libraries have computers available for public use which could be employed to work on this kind of project on their own time.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Software Review: Learning.com

Web Browsing: Research and Citing Sources Grades 6-8

http://learning.com/

Review
:


Because I am already quite proficient with all of the components of this series of lessons, I did not learn anything of particular note. However, I was impressed with the quality of the presentations and feel that they would be an excellent method for teaching the subject of Web literacy. The only concern that I might have with using this in a classroom is due to the inability to skip ahead in the lessons. Some students who are more advanced than others might be bored by the basic information and tune out, missing the more complex information presented farther in. Aside from this, I did not experience any problems with the program; it ran smoothly and without any bugs or other notable errors.

Learning.com Web Browsing Unit. Retrieved March 2, 2009, from http://platform.learning.com

NETS Standards Addressed:

Browsing Basics
Standards addressed:
5. Digital Citizenship- Students understand human, cultural, and societal issues related to technology and practice legal and ethical behavior.
a. advocate and practice safe, legal, and responsible use of information and technology.
6. Technology Operations and Concepts- Students demonstrate a sound understanding of technology concepts, systems, and operations.
a. understand and use technology systems.
b. select and use applications effectively and productively.

URLs
Standards addressed:
1. Creativity and Innovation- Students demonstrate creative thinking, construct knowledge, and develop innovative products and processes using technology.
a. apply existing knowledge to generate new ideas, products, or processes.
2. Communication and Collaboration- Students use digital media and environments to communicate and work collaboratively, including at a distance, to support individual learning and contribute to the learning of others.
a. interact, collaborate, and publish with peers, experts, or others employing a variety of digital environments and media.
6. Technology Operations and Concepts- Students demonstrate a sound understanding of technology concepts, systems, and operations.
a. understand and use technology systems.
b. select and use applications effectively and productively.

Web Searches
Standards addressed:
4. Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Decision Making- Students use critical thinking skills to plan and conduct research, manage projects, solve problems, and make informed decisions using appropriate digital tools and resources.
c. collect and analyze data to identify solutions and/or make informed decisions.
5. Digital Citizenship- Students understand human, cultural, and societal issues related to technology and practice legal and ethical behavior.
a. advocate and practice safe, legal, and responsible use of information and technology.
6. Technology Operations and Concepts- Students demonstrate a sound understanding of technology concepts, systems, and operations.
a. understand and use technology systems.
b. select and use applications effectively and productively.

Validity and Sourcing
Standards addressed:
2. Communication and Collaboration- Students use digital media and environments to communicate and work collaboratively, including at a distance, to support individual learning and contribute to the learning of others.
a. interact, collaborate, and publish with peers, experts, or others employing a variety of digital environments and media.
b. communicate information and ideas effectively to multiple audiences using a variety of media and formats.
5. Digital Citizenship- Students understand human, cultural, and societal issues related to technology and practice legal and ethical behavior.
a. advocate and practice safe, legal, and responsible use of information and technology.
b. exhibit a positive attitude toward using technology that supports collaboration, learning, and productivity.
6. Technology Operations and Concepts- Students demonstrate a sound understanding of technology concepts, systems, and operations.
a. understand and use technology systems.
b. select and use applications effectively and productively.

ISTE Standards, (2007) Nets for students 2007. Retrieved March 2, 2009, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/2007Standards/NETS_for_Students_2007.htm

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

History Now Newsletter


Monday, February 16, 2009

Review of Making History Come Alive (November 2003)

Making History Come Alive, by Howard Levin

This article describes a project in a San Francisco high school in which students interviewed Holocaust survivors, produced videos of these interviews, and published them online.

Q1: How applicable is this approach to a wide variety of different schools?
A1: In short, not very. This project took place at an independent high school that had access to funds that are simply not present at most schools. For instance, every student receives an Apple iBook laptop, whereas in some school districts even providing a computer lab with reasonable access for students is a struggle. Additionally, they received several grants and donations which allowed the purchase of a professional-quality camera, tripod, lighting equipment, and digital video tape. However, the trend in technology is always towards greater availability and lower prices- as time passes, perhaps this type of project would become more easily applied to a greater diversity of school settings.

Q2: How effective is this project at teaching students about history?
A2: I think that the project would certainly teach students about their chosen subject's experiences in World War II. It would give them an understanding of the emotional and personal impact of the Holocaust. However, I'm uncertain as to how much this project contributes to the overall history education of the students. The amount of time this project would require necessitates a certain focus on a specific event that occurred in a very limited period of history. If the course were intended to teach specifically about the Holocaust, this would seem like a worthwhile project. However, in a course about World history or Western Hemisphere history 1900-present, I feel that it would pull too much time away from other important topics that are equally deserving of attention.

Friday, February 6, 2009

Review of Digital Images in the History Classroom (May 2004)

Digital Images in the History Classroom , by Stephanie van Hover, Kathy Swan, and Michael J. Berson

Q1: What can the use of digital images contribute to the teaching of history?
A1: The article points out the importance of teaching students to "thoughtfully interpret images", because they are so prevalent in our understandings of events of the past, present, and future. It also notes that the availability of large databases of images through sites such as the Library of Congress and the Smithsonian has expanded students' possible exposure to images far beyond what was possible with textbooks as the primary source. Finally, the article suggests that images are a more accessible route to stimulate interest among students that may not be initially intrigued by history or social sciences.

Q2: How can digital images be incorporated into history curricula?
A2: The article gave one interesting suggestion for using images, wherein the instructor selected a number of images (in this case five) from significantly different time periods and which gave a number of significant chronological clues. Students were then assigned to place the images in chronological order and to hypothesize a date when it was taken. They were then asked how they knew where images should be placed in the time line, and how they determined their hypothetical dates.

In summary, I thought that this article was well-written and put forth some useful ideas for teachers. I particularly liked the way that the sample exercise could help to turn students from passive observers of visual images into active investigators into the meaning and circumstances reflected in digital images.